Link to Vancouver Observer article
Author: admin
Federal Ethics Commissioner should investigate whether former Conservative Cabinet minister has shared secret information with clients, which would violate the Conflict of Interest Act
Link to Vancouver Observer article
Increasing discretionary powers of Cabinet ministers to make legal rulings is dangerously undemocratic
Link to iPolitics article
Your 14 Democracy wins in 2014
Dear Friends,
What kind of governments and big businesses do you want to pass on to the next generations in your family – to your kids, nieces, nephews or grandchildren?
Do you want your family to continue to live in a Canada run by the many dishonest, unethical, secretive, unrepresentative and wasteful governments and big businesses we have now? Your family deserves better, and you can help make things better for them by making a new year resolution right now to help make Canada more democratic and fair.
Just think about how much money people would have saved if governments had made the changes Democracy Watch called for years ago to stop corruption and waste in the Senate, in military spending projects, in Ontario’s power projects and health care companies, in Quebec’s provincial and city construction projects, and to help stop many other similar government boondoggles in every province and territory.
Think about how many unfair decisions governments and big businesses have imposed on us all — often without even asking what we think — decisions that have taken Canada backwards, polluted and killed, or hurt people you know.
The democracy changes Democracy Watch and its allies win for you and yours save you money by making government more honest, efficient and effective – and help save the environment, our public health care system, jobs and lots of other things you care about — and help save you and your family from abuses and ripoffs.
These key changes stop governments from selling out Canada in secret, corrupt deals with big businesses, and stop gouging and other unfair business practices.
“The watchdog of watchdogs.” Evan Solomon, Host CBC’s Power and Politics
Tens of thousands of people, and more than 100 organizations, across Canada have joined the Democracy Watcher Network and helped win key changes for honest, ethical, open, representative and waste-preventing governments and big businesses.
Democracy Watch has been dedicated and pushing and winning for the past 20 years for you and yours the many changes needed to have a fair and democratic Canada. Democracy Watch guarantees you a bigger bang for your buck than any other group in Canada – and has won for you more than 110 changes so far since 1993 (more than any other citizen group). See details about what Democracy Watch has done for you and yours here.
“Democracy Watch, a persistent government-ethics advocacy group . . .” Maclean’s magazine
Not only has Democracy Watch won more changes for you than any other group since 1993, it also wins national and local media coverage several times every month for free, coverage that informs millions of Canadians about key problems and issues. Democracy Watch’s campaigns have been in the news headlines more than 750 times in 2013 – that’s twice a day – and receive media coverage like this year after year. See details here.
Democracy Watch has very low office costs, doesn’t spend thousands of dollars on fundraising consultants, appeals or advertising, and stays independent by not taking money from governments or big businesses – Democracy Watch is supported only by donations from people like you, and offers you 4 low-cost, easy ways to give.
“Democracy Watch, the dogged independent group that monitors the inner workings of government . . .” Toronto Star editorial
So please help Democracy Watch win even more democracy for you and yours in 2014 by becoming a supporter today. See 14 reasons to give for democracy in 2014 set out below – and please send this message on to anyone you think may be interested.
All together we can make Canada the world’s leading democracy! (See details below)
Thank you very much for your support, and happy holidays,
Duff, Tyler, Brad, Marilou, David and Josephine
on behalf of the many volunteers and supporters who make Democracy Watch’s work possible, and successful (thank you very much to all of you!)
P.S. Democracy Watch needs $150,000 to keeping pushing for, and winning, many key democracy and corporate responsibility changes for you in 2014 — please click here to give now, and see 14 reasons to give listed below:
- 1,250 people giving just $10 per month (less than a cup of coffee a day) = $150,000
- 625 people giving just $20 per month (still less than a coffee a day) = $150,000
And if you like send an email when you give to: [email protected] and list which campaigns you want your donation to support — you can also help out as a Democracy Watcher in other key ways – for details click here.
“…the tireless advocates at Democracy Watch“ Kady O’Malley, CBC News
A busy 2013, and a very important next year of key democracy changes
This past year was full of scandals involving many federal, provincial and city politicians and government officials, and many big businesses. Democracy Watch has been there watching for you from 1993 right through 2013 — pushing all governments and big businesses to clean up their act — and Democracy Watch will continue pushing for you through 2014.
You can be sure Democracy Watch makes every dollar you donate count. Please your support is needed right now here for the following 7 key campaign actions that will cost $75,000 to win in 2014:
- Nationwide campaign to strengthen rules and enforcement to stop fraud spending by politicians across Canada – see details here;
- Nationwide petition and letter-writing drive calling for an independent prosecutor to ensure a full RCMP investigation into the Senate spending scandal, and that all wrongdoers are prosecuted, and pursuing official complaints to watchdogs – see details here and here;
- Nationwide letter-writing campaign to ban fraud election robocalls, and strengthen fair election enforcement, across Canada – see details here;
- Nationwide letter-writing campaign to restrict the excessive control political leaders have over politicians in their party, and ensure your politicians represent you – see details here;
- Nationwide letter-writing campaign for key changes to stop politicians doing secret deals with big businesses that make them a lot of money, but hurt you and your community – see details here;
- Pursuing a complaint to stop Prime Minister Harper’s muzzling of government scientists – see details here, and;
- Pursuing an ethics complaint against City of Toronto Mayor Rob Ford – see details here.
Yes, that’s right, Democracy Watch only needs $75,000 to do these 7 very effective campaign actions to win key democracy changes for you. Why? Because Democracy Watch is committed to delivering more to you for less.
Democracy Watch uses your donations to support effective complaints, lawsuits, media and letter-writing campaigns that corner politicians and force them to make key, progressive changes, or embarrass themselves publicly by dodging pointed questions or hiding scandals.
Democracy Watch is the only group in Canada pushing for all the 7 more key democracy and corporate responsibility changes listed below, and we need to raise another $75,000 to keep pushing in 2014 for these important changes:
- To restrict the powers of the Prime Minister and provincial premiers to stop unfair abuses, and make government decision-making much more democratic – see details here and here;
- To require everyone in politics to be honest (finally) – see details here;
- To require every big business to act responsibly in every way – see details here;
- To stop dangerous government secrecy, and protect people who blow the whistle on wrongdoing that hurts you – see details here;
- To require the big banks to serve everyone fairly and well at fair prices, and to loan and invest in responsible, sustainable ways – see details here;
- To require all political donations to be made public, and ban anyone from using money to influence politicians or government officials – see details here, and;
- To create citizen-run watchdog groups for every big industry — including oil and gas industry, phone and cable TV, forestry, mining, airlines and financial industry – see details here.
So please help Democracy Watch raise the $150,000 it needs to keeping pushing for a more fair and democratic Canada in 2014 by clicking here to give now.
Thank you very much for your support!
P.P.S. Please pass on this message to anyone you think may be interested – thank you again
Ethics Commissioner’s quick ruling based on very questionable claim that law does not allow her to investigate any of the interventions by PMO staff in the Senate audit of Senator Duffy while the RCMP is investigating Nigel Wright’s payment to Duffy
More than 149,000 messages sent calling for changes to clean up unethical law
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
December 17, 2013
OTTAWA – Today, following its complaint filed December 11th with federal Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson, Democracy Watch released the ruling it received from Commissioner Dawson last Friday, December 13th. The ruling uses a very questionable claim to reject Democracy Watch’s request for an inquiry into the interventions by Nigel Wright, Patrick Rogers, Chris Woodcock and Benjamin Perrin in the Senate Committee’s audit of Senator Mike Duffy to determine if their actions violated the Conflict of Interest Act (the “Act”).
The Ethics Commissioner is only required to suspend an inquiry if: 1. she reasonably believes that the actions of the person she is investigating violate another law (clause 49(1)(a) of the Act), or 2. she finds out that another authority is investigating the same “subject-matter” as she is (clause 49(1)(b)), or 3. she finds out that charges have been laid for the same “subject-matter” she is investigating (clause 49(1)(b)).
In her ruling, sent to Democracy Watch just two days after it filed its complaint, Commissioner Dawson claims that the RCMP’s investigation into Wright’s payment to Duffy (which is the only thing the RCMP has confirmed it is investigating) is the same “subject-matter” as the intervention by Wright and the others into the Senate committee’s audit of Senator Duffy.
In Democracy Watch’s opinion this is a false claim. Democracy Watch’s complaint letter also requested that the Ethics Commissioner initiate an inquiry into Mr. Perrin’s actions of assisting Mr. Wright in making the payment of more than $90,000 to Senator Duffy. Democracy Watch agrees that the Ethics Commissioner cannot investigate these actions by Mr. Perrin now as they actually are the same “subject-matter” as the RCMP investigation. However, the other actions by PMO staff can clearly be investigated now.
“As she has many times before, Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson has again used a false reason to roll over like a lapdog and refuse to investigate and rule on the very questionable actions of Conservatives, this time protecting PMO staff from accountability for intervening in the Senate committee’s audit of Senator Duffy,” said Duff Conacher, Board member of Democracy Watch. “This ruling continues Commissioner Dawson’s very weak enforcement record over the past 6 years that includes her incredible ruling that let dozens of Conservatives off the hook when they handed out government cheques with the Conservative Party logo on them, her more than 80 secret rulings covering up who knows what wrongdoing, her illegal use of screens to cover up recusals that the law requires government officials to disclose, and the three times she has let Nigel Wright off the hook.” (See details in Backgrounder below).
Ethics Commissioner Dawson also claims in her December 13th ruling that it would not be in the public interest for her to investigate now. There is no likelihood that an inquiry by the Ethics Commissioner into the intervention by PMO staff into the Senate committee’s audit of Mike Duffy will negatively affect the RCMP’s investigation of Nigel Wright’s payment to Senator Duffy as all the key facts of the payment have been publicly disclosed and admitted.
Also in her December 13th ruling letter to Democracy Watch, Commissioner Dawson claims that she did not have time to issue a ruling when she suspended her inquiry into Wright’s payment to Senator Duffy on June 13th after the RCMP confirmed that it was investigating the payment. Democracy Watch’s opinion is that she could have easily found Wright guilty before the RCMP confirmed its investigation given that it was very clear by May 15th that Mr. Wright had improperly furthered Senator Duffy’s private interests by making the payment to him.
As well, in her December 13th letter Commissioner Dawson also claims that conflicts of interest “screens” that she has set up for various government officials, including Nigel Wright, are legal even though the screens mean that officials who recuse themselves from decision-making processes because of conflicts of interest do not disclose their recusals publicly as they are clearly required to do by subsection 25(1) of the Act.
More than 149,000 messages have been sent through Democracy Watch’s letter-writing campaign calling for changes to clean up the federal ethics law, and laws across Canada. “When Parliament opens again in late January, the House Ethics Committee will issue its report on changes needed to the federal ethics enforcement system, and hopefully they will recommend many changes to clean up the dangerously unethical mess caused by Commissioner Dawson and the many loopholes and flaws in the law,” said Conacher.
– 30 –
FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT:
Duff Conacher, Board member of Democracy Watch
Tel: 613-241-5179 Cell: 416-546-3443
Email: [email protected]
Federal Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson’s weak enforcement record
Federal Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson has had a very weak enforcement record since 2007, including letting dozens of Conservatives off the hook for very questionable actions, and making more than 80 secret rulings.
Ethics Commissioner Dawson’s first cover-up for Nigel Wright
Commissioner Dawson’s first cover-up for Nigel Wright was her creation of an illegal, so-called ethics screen when Wright first took the job that violated the requirement in subsection 25(1) of the Conflict of Interest Act to make a public declaration within 60 days every time Wright recused himself from a decision-making process because of a conflict of interest. This “screen” was supposedly enforced by the Deputy Chief of Staff. As a result of this cover-up, all of Wright’s recusals have been kept secret, and there is no way to tell if he ever failed to recuse himself as required by the Act.
Ethics Commissioner Dawson’s second cover-up for Nigel Wright
Commissioner Dawson’s second cover-up for Wright was when she abandoned her investigation last fall without issuing a notice, let alone a ruling, of whether Wright violated the Act by taking part in discussions of issues that affect Barrick Gold. The Ethics Commissioner is allowed to do this under s. 45 of the Act. The cover-up only came to light because Canadian Press journalist Joan Bryden pressed Commissioner Dawson to make a public statement about the case. Commissioner Dawson’s statement failed to set out any reasons why she concluded that Wright had not violated the Act.
Ethics Commissioner Dawson’s third cover-up for Nigel Wright
Commissioner Dawson’s third cover-up for Wright was when she failed to issue a ruling concerning Mr. Wright’s payment to Senator Duffy of more than $90,000, which she could have done easily last June before the RCMP announced its investigation into the payment because the facts of the payment had been public for a month already.
Conflict of Interest Act missing key rules and accountability measures
The Conservatives broke a 2006 election promise (one of their many broken accountability promises) to include key ethics rules in the new Conflict of Interest Act prohibiting dishonesty and being in even an appearance of a conflict of interest, as Prime Minister Harper instead put those rules in his Accountability Guide for ministers and other senior officials so he could ignore the rules (as he has since – see the rules in Annex A, Part 1 of the Guide).
Because of section 66 added to the new Act by the Conservatives in 2006, the Ethics Commissioner’s rulings cannot be challenged in court if she has factual or legal errors in her rulings. There are no mandatory penalties for violating the ethics rules in the Act. As well, if Prime Minister Harper approves it, Commissioner Dawson’s term in office can be renewed for another seven years in 2014 so she has an incentive to please him.
Democracy Watch’s Government Ethics Campaign
Federal Conservatives could try to create one ethics code and enforcement agency for the House of Commons and Senate
Link to Hill Times article
Democracy Watch calls again on Toronto Integrity Commissioner to investigate and rule on whether Rob Ford has violated standards of conduct in council code
Group prepared to appeal to court if Commissioner rejects ruling
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Monday, December 16, 2013
OTTAWA – Today, Democracy Watch released the complaint affidavit it is filing with the City of Toronto Integrity Commissioner today requesting that in Democracy Watch’s opinion she should investigate Rob Ford’s well-publicized, and self-admitted, actions in the past year to determine if they violate the Code of Conduct for Members of Council (the “Code”).
The Integrity Commissioner recently ruled on a separate complaint that the City council filed about different actions by Rob Ford that the City, and in that ruling she said that she thinks the general standards of conduct in the Code are “aspirational” and not enforceable. Democracy Watch disagrees and is appealing to the Commissioner to uphold the standards as they are among the most important rules in the Code.
Democracy Watch is prepared to appeal the Integrity Commissioner’s ruling in court if she rejects its complaint on the same grounds.
The preamble to the Code includes four statements of principle that “underline” the Code, including that members of Council should perform their functions with “integrity”; perform their duties and arrange their private affairs “in a manner that promotes public confidence and will bear close public scrutiny”; and uphold both the letter and the spirit of all laws.
The Code does not say that the statements of principle in the preamble are not enforceable, and Democracy Watch’s opinion is that they are legally enforceable rules and that the Integrity Commissioner can investigate alleged violations of the principles and issue a ruling, including recommending the possible penalties for violations of a reprimand or a suspension of up to 90 days (the Council then votes on what penalty to impose, if any).
“Democracy Watch believes that Toronto’s Integrity Commissioner is legally allowed to rule on whether Rob Ford’s actions over the past year violate the general standards of conduct and integrity set out in the councillor’s code of conduct,” said Duff Conacher, Board member of Democracy Watch. “If the Integrity Commissioner rules that these general integrity standards are not enforceable, then the provincial government should quickly pass a law requiring all councillors across Ontario to comply with such standards, with a sliding scale of penalties depending on the significance of the violation, from short suspensions up to losing their job and pension.”
In July 2011, Rob Ford admitted to talking on his cellphone while driving which is a violation of provincial law. On November 3, 2013, I verily believe that Rob Ford admitted on his then-radio show that he had texted while driving, which is a violation of provincial law. On November 5, 2013, Rob Ford admitted publicly that he had smoked crack cocaine, which is a violation of federal law.
On November 7, 2013, a video was made public by various media outlets in which Rob Ford appears and utters threats to kill an unnamed person, and making such statements is a violation of federal law. On November 13, 2013, Rob Ford admitted at a meeting of council that he had bought illegal drugs during his term as Mayor. On November 14, 2013, Rob Ford publicly admitted to drinking alcohol and then driving, which is a violation of provincial law.
As well, Rob Ford has publicly apologized for some of his actions again and again and again. In addition, on November 5, 2013, the results of a survey by Forum Research were released and showed that 59 percent of Toronto voters wanted Rob Ford to resign. , and on November 13, 2013, the results of a survey by Ipsos-Reid were released publicly and showed that 41 percent believed Rob Ford should resign, 35 percent believed that he should take a leave of absence, while 24 percent believed that he should remain in office.
Democracy Watch’s opinion is that Rob Ford’s self-admitted violations of various laws violate the principles in the Code, and his apologies show that Rob Ford himself, and the surveys show that a majority of voters in Toronto, believe that his actions do not meet the standards established by the statements of principle that require members of council to act with “integrity” and act in ways that promote public confidence and bear close public scrutiny.
– 30 –
FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT:
Duff Conacher, Board member of Democracy Watch
Tel: 613-241-5179
Cell: 416-546-3443
Email: [email protected]
Democracy Watch’s Government Ethics Campaign
Environment Canada sensitive about criticism on muzzling scientists, as Information Commissioner continues to investigate Democracy Watch’s complaint
Link to online article
Federal political parties make good move of imposing ethics rules on political staff, but bad move of gagging them forever
Link to website article
Environment Canada sensitive about criticism on muzzling scientists, as Information Commissioner continues to investigate Democracy Watch’s complaint
Link to Huffington Post blog