Case alleges Trudeau Liberal’s consultation with only Liberals across Canada taints appointments with partisan bias that violates independence of courts and public’s Charter right to courts that appear, and are, impartial

Trudeau Cabinet still trying to stop court from considering government emails reported on in La Presse, and evidence that lawyer associations, law professors, experts and media all think the Liberals’ appointment process is too political

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Monday, April 15, 2024

TORONTO – Today, Democracy Watch is at the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) in Toronto challenging the Federal Court ruling in January 2023 that the federal government’s too-political, unconstitutional system for appointing judges to the federal courts and all provincial superior courts and courts of appeal, and promoting judges within those courts, is constitutional. Ross & McBride LLP is representing Democracy Watch and its co-founder Duff Conacher in the case.

The case is being heard in person at the FCA at 180 Queen St. W., 7th floor, Toronto, and you click here to register to watch the hearing on Zoom.

Click here to see DWatch’s arguments that the federal appointments system is too open to political interference that violates the constitutional principle that guarantees the independence of courts under Part VII of the Constitution, and the public’s Charter right to impartial courts under sections 7, 11(d) (and, indirectly, 24(1)).

Click here to see the Backgrounder on how political and partisan the federal appointments system is compared to the Quebec and UK systems.  The federal Minister has too much political control of the process from start to finish, from choosing the majority of the members of the advisory committees, to receiving long lists of candidates from those committees, to circulating those lists secretly to MPs, Cabinet ministers and ruling party officials before making the final choice.  The Minister also makes decisions, without any restrictions, about promoting sitting judges to a court of appeal.

The appointment process for the federal and provincial superior and appeal courts matters a lot because the Supreme Court of Canada refuses to hear 90% of appeals from these courts, and many appeals are also refused by provincial appeal courts, so in many cases the provincial superior courts are the public’s actual court of last resort.

In addition, the Ford Conservative government in Ontario used the federal system as cover for changes to Ontario’s judicial appointment system made in 2021 to allow Ford to appoint only Conservatives who agree with his government’s agenda.

Details about how the federal Minister of Justice only consults with officials from Liberal Party not other parties, and only the Liberal Party’s database, in reviewing the long lists of candidates for judicial appointments submitted by advisory committees made up of people chosen mostly by the Minister have been confirmed by whistleblowers disclosing internal government emails to the Globe and Mail and CBC and Radio-Canada and La Presse, and the appointments system has been shown to favour Liberal donors.

Democracy Watch has also submitted to the court public letters and articles that lawyer associations (including the Canadian Bar Association), law professors, lawyers, experts and media have produced in the last few years expressing their concerns about how political the federal judicial appointment is, and how that undermines the public’s confidence in the independence and impartiality of the judiciary.  In April 2020, the Canadian Judicial Council found that Justice Colleen Suche, spouse of then-federal Natural Resources Cabinet Minister Jim Carr, had violated the judiciary’s ethics code by providing suggestions about who the federal Cabinet should appoint as judges.

There are also concerns that the partisan nature of the appointment process may be inhibiting the appointment of judges that reflect Canada’s diversity.  In June 2020, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada expressed the need for “our courts, including our highest court, to reflect the diversity of Canadians.”  In September 2020, 36 lawyers associations, legal clinics and advocacy groups called for changes to the appointment process, as did the Canadian Bar Association, to increase the appointment of more Black, Indigenous and People of Colour (BIPOC) judges.

Department of Justice lawyers are asking the FCA to ignore almost all this evidence that Democracy Watch filed in a December 2020 affidavit (PDF) and in a second affidavit (PDF) about internal government emails reported on in La Presse October 2020.

– 30 –

FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT:
Duff Conacher, Co-founder of Democracy Watch
Tel: (613) 241-5179
Cell: 416-546-3443
Email: [email protected]

See more at Democracy Watch’s Stop Bad Government Appointments Campaign and Stop Unfair Law Enforcement Campaign