OTTAWA—Kevin McCarthy, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty’s chief of staff and one-time chief policy adviser on the banking sector, is leaving the federal government to go to a new job at Scotiabank, the Star has learned.

---

Letter to the Editor by Democracy Watch Board Member Duff Conacher published in the Globe and Mail

---

Dear Editor,

Your article makes the inaccurate claim that the federal Conservatives’ 2006 Accountability Act prevents “federal officials from lobbying the government for up to five years after their retirement . . .” (PM’s former Quebec adviser hired by lobbying firm – Sept. 4).

In fact, because of huge loopholes in the federal Lobbying Act and Conflict of Interest Act and codes, Cabinet ministers, their staff, Cabinet appointees, MPs and senators and their staff are all allowed to lobby the government the same day they retire or resign.

Under rules that have existed since 1986, Cabinet ministers for two years, and senior government officials for one year, have be careful whom they lobby for, and whom they lobby — but they are allowed to start lobbying the day they leave government.

The Accountability Act did nothing to close the loopholes, and Treasury Board minister Tony Clement has failed to take any steps to implement the proposals made in a May 2012 House of Commons Ethics Committee report to close some (but unfortunately not all) of the loopholes.

Until these loopholes are closed, everyone involved in federal politics will continue to be free to cash in and sell their inside information and connections to the highest bidder as soon as they finish their so-called public service.

Sincerely,

Duff Conacher
Board Member of Democracy Watch
Director of GoodOrg.ca Consulting

Internet: http://goodorg.ca
Twitter: @DuffConacher

---

Democracy Watch’s Government Ethics Campaign

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

OTTAWA – Today, Democracy Watch launched a national petition on Change.org calling for Prime Minister Stephen Harper to open Parliament on September 16th, as scheduled, and for all parties to work together to pass laws restricting the use of prorogation.

“The shut down by Prime Minister Stephen Harper until October of this year, past prorogations by Prime Minister Harper and Prime Minister Chretien and some premiers, and the recent shutdowns of provincial legislatures by B.C. Premier Christy Clark, Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Kathy Dunderdale, and former Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty make it clear that new rules are needed across Canada to ensure fairness and democratic accountability in the opening and shutting down of legislatures,” said Tyler Sommers, Coordinator of Democracy Watch.

In early 2010, more than 220,000 Canadians joined a Facebook group against the prorogation of the federal Parliament by Prime Minister Harper, and more than 20,000 protested in demonstrations across the country, but federal opposition parties failed to respond to this broad-based call to work together during the minority government situation to change the Parliament of Canada Act to set rules on the opening and closing of Parliament.

In most countries in the world, including the parliamentary democracies of Britain, Australia and New Zealand, the constitution or written constitutional conventions or laws govern when the legislature opens and closes, not the whims of the ruling party leader.  A survey of more than 2,000 Canadians commissioned by Your Canada, Your Constitution in December 2012 showed that 84% want such clear, written rules established in Canada, enforced by the Supreme Court of Canada.

Democracy Watch is calling on Canadians to sign the petition calling for Prime Minister Harper to open Parliament as scheduled and for federal politicians to pass a clear and specific law regarding prorogations including the following:

1. only allowing the Prime Minister alone to prorogue when the legislature is already adjourned, and only for the adjournment time period.
2. requiring approval of 2/3 of MPs in the House of Commons before a prorogation can happen when the House is open.
3. limiting the length of prorogation to a maximum of 2 weeks.
4. requiring that the legislature be opened within 30 days after each election.

– 30 –

FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT:
Tyler Sommers, Coordinator of Democracy Watch
Tel: (613) 241-5179
[email protected]

---

Democracy Watch’s Change.Org Petition

Edmonton MLA Peter Sandhu aggressively lobbied ministers and department officials for changes to a provincial law which would benefit his financially troubled home-building company.

Link to NOW magazine article

---

Letter to the Editor by Democracy Watch Coordinator Tyler Sommers published by iPolitics and the Hill Times, covered by CBC News and The Canadian Press, with CTV News Winnipeg, the Huffington Post, Metro News and 10 other media outlets all publishing the Canadian Press piece, and was quoted in a Canada.com article that was published by 3 Postmedia News newspapers.

---

Federal Conservative MP Merv Tweed is allowed to lobby his government in secret the day he resigns his seat and becomes President of Omnitrax raliway company because the Conservatives, specifically Minister Tony Clement, have failed to implement the May 2012 recommendations of the House Ethics Committee.

The Committee recommended closing some of the key loopholes that allow for secret, unethical lobbying, especially by former politicians. In his September 2012 response to the Committee, Minister Clement essentially rejected the Committee’s proposed change that would prohibit former politicians from lobbying right after they leave their position, and would require that all paid lobbying activity be disclosed.

As a result, Mr. Tweed will be allowed to lobby his former colleagues in secret up to one day each week, starting the day he leaves.

In fact, because the Conservatives broke their 2006 election promises to close lobbying restriction loopholes, not only MPs but also Cabinet ministers, senior government officials, senators and their staff, and the staff of MPs are all also allowed to lobby for a business the same day they leave their position, due to the 20% loophole, and also the following loopholes:

• all of them can be hired on contract to give advice, while providing free lobbying in secret, because the law does not require registration or disclosure of unpaid lobbying;
• all of them can be hired on contract or work as an employee of a business to lobby in secret about the enforcement, interpretation or application of laws and regulations in secret (which is a huge area of lobbying, especially for big businesses) because the law does not require registration or disclosure of this lobbying, and;
• all of them can, while lobbying, have secret emails, texts, phone calls and even meetings with Cabinet ministers and senior government officials as long as the minister or official initiates the communication or meeting (which they do whenever they want to have secret, unethical relations with a lobbyist) because the law only requires only oral, pre-arranged communications initiated by the lobbyist to be disclosed

For Cabinet ministers, there is a 2-year prohibition in the Conflict of Interest Act on taking jobs with or lobbying for any business or organization or person they had significant official dealings with in their last year in office (1-year for Cabinet staff and appointees and senior government officials). As well, public servants face the same 1-year prohbition under their conflict of interest code). However, all these people are still allowed to take jobs with, or lobby for, other businesses, organizations and people.

Canadians deserve better, especially from the Conservatives who promised to clean up the federal government.

---

Democracy Watch’s Government Ethics Campaign

Democracy Watch’s submission on the Lobbying Act.

Brandon-Souris MP Merv Tweed is trading Parliament Hill for the Port of Churchill, leaving federal politics to run Omnitrax Canada.

OTTAWA — It was one in a seemingly innocuous list of emails Elections Canada received from a member of the public last year.

But the questions put forward by this particular, unidentified voter touched on what some say is a major loophole in the conduct of fair and honest federal election campaigns.

If there were more rock ‘n’ roll, at least Canadian politics would be entertaining. But the drugs, corruption and bitter negativity that have plagued every level of government this spring is just turning people off.

Increase voter turnout by changing voting system, passing honesty-in-politics law, fixing by-election and election dates for late fall/early spring, and advertising all voter rights

Thursday, August 8, 2013

OTTAWA – Today Democracy Watch called for democratic changes to Ontario’s election system in response to low voter turnout in the recent provincial by-elections.  Voter turnout will increase if the voting system is changed, an honesty-in-politics law is passed, by-election and election dates are fixed for late fall or early spring, and if Elections Ontario is required to educate Ontarians about all their voting rights in its advertising.

“The low average voter turnout of about 37% in the five by-elections held last week, along with the 49% turnout in the 2011 Ontario election,  show clearly that major changes are needed to counter the threat of low turnout to the provincial government’s democratic legitimacy.” said Tyler Sommers, Coordinator of Democracy Watch.  “Unfortunately Elections Ontario and the Government of Ontario have failed to change anything so far, and Premier Wynne chose dates for the by-elections when many people were on holiday which likely hurt voter turnout.”

In addition to Elections Ontario being given the power to set by-election dates, and requiring it to educate voters about their right to decline the ballot (and disclosing declined ballot totals in election results), the provincial Election Act must also be changed to require the holding of by-elections and elections in the late fall or early spring, when holidays, student exams and summer jobs, and general busyness of anyone with kids, are least likely to make it difficult for large numbers of people voting.

In addition, the most important changes the Ontario parties can make to increase voter turnout are as follows:

• pass an honesty-in-politics law that gives voters an easy, low-cost way to file complaints to the Integrity Commissioner, and gives the Commissioner the power to penalize misleaders (and requires MPPs who switch parties in-between elections to resign and run in a by-election);
• change the voting system so that the percentage of MPPs each party receives more closely matches the popular vote percentages.

These changes would give voters a reason to vote because they would know that voting for a specific party would mean a guaranteed result in terms of percentage of MPPs elected and promises kept.

In addition, if the parties strengthen provincial ethics, political finance, lobbying, open government, and whistleblower protection laws, voters will have more reason to vote because they would be more assured of good government no matter which party won.

“In addition to election dates often making it difficult for people to pay full attention to campaigns and get to the polls on election day, Canadians know from experience that they are not going to get what they vote for, and are likely to get dishonest, secretive, unethical, unrepresentative and wasteful government no matter who they vote for, and as a result no one should be surprised to see voter turnout at such low levels,” said Sommers.

These problems exist in all the provinces and territories across Canada.  All of these changes should be made by the federal and provincial and territorial governments, and for their municipalities, before either mandatory or Internet voting are tried (because both of those changes will likely have serious negative effects).

-30-

FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT:
Tyler Sommers, Coordinator of Democracy Watch
Tel: (613) 241-5179
[email protected]

---

Democracy Watch’s Democratic Voting Systems Campaign