Please support democracy

Without your support, Democracy Watch can't win key changes to stop governments and big businesses from abusing their power and hurting you and your family. Please click here to support democracy now

Senate should close loopholes and strengthen enforcement system in anti-foreign interference Bill C-70 if House doesn’t

Bill C-70 allows secret interference in party leadership contests, and secret communications with nomination and leadership contestants and party officials, and by using lobbyists, family members, friends and officials as “proxies” for influence communications

Proposed new enforcement Commissioner must be made independent of ruling party Cabinet, effective, transparent and accountable

Investigations with public rulings before the next election needed on all allegations that MPs and Senators helped foreign governments interfere in Canadian politics — other loopholes also need to be closed to prevent interference and misinformation

Monday, June 10, 2024

OTTAWA – Today, as the House of Commons Public Safety and National Security Committee meets this afternoon from 3:30 to 8:30 pm ET to consider amendments to Bill C-70, and as Democracy Watch testifies before the Senate National Security, Defence and Veterans Affairs Committee this afternoon at 3:10 pm ET during its pre-study of the Bill, Democracy Watch released the submission it filed last week with the two committees calling on all parties to work together to make key changes to close loopholes in Bill C-70 so that all secret foreign interference and influence activities will be prohibited and required to be disclosed, and so enforcement will be independent, effective, transparent and accountable.

Democracy Watch also called on CSIS, as soon as Bill C-70 is enacted to allow it, to share the redacted information mentioned in the recent NSICOP report that it has on MPs and/or Senators helping foreign governments interfere in Canadian politics with the RCMP, Commissioner of Canada Elections and Ethics Commissioner depending on the possible laws that were violated, who should investigate and issue public rulings on every case before the next election, naming the politician if there is clear evidence that they violated any law. While the Hogue Inquiry into foreign interference can and should examine the information, as opposition parties have called for, it can’t make findings concerning violations of laws.

Democracy Watch filed a summary submission with the committees listing the key changes needed to close loopholes in the prohibitions and requirements to disclose foreign interference and influence activities in the proposed new Foreign Influence Registry (FIR), and to make the proposed new Foreign Influence Transparency (FIT) Commissioner independent of the ruling party, empowered to enforce the rules effectively, required to issue public rulings and impose penalties for violations in every case, and accountable to the courts to ensure the Commissioner enforces the rules properly.  DWatch also filed a full submission with the committees detailing the key changes and why they are needed.

Click here to see Democracy Watch’s summary submission on Bill C-70 in English.  Cliquez ici pour voir le résumé de la soumission en français.  Click here to see the full submission (in English only). If the loopholes in Bill C-70 are not closed, the following foreign interference and influence activities will continue to be legal, and foreign agents will not be required to register and disclose the following activities in the Foreign Influence Registry (FIR):

1. Activities undertaken by businesses and organizations;

2. Activities to interfere in political party leadership contests;

3. Communications with nomination contestants and party leadership contestants who are not MPs or Cabinet ministers;

4. Communications with election candidates who are not Cabinet ministers;

5. Communications with people who have been elected as MPs or appointed as Senators but have not yet taken office;

6. Communications with territorial politicians and public officials, and provincial and municipal government appointees;

7. Communications with judges and lieutenant governors;

8. A foreign agent using a lobbyist as a “proxy” for their influence activities (many changes are needed to the federal Lobbying Act and provincial, territorial and municipal lobbying laws to prevent this by prohibiting secret lobbying), and;

9. A foreign agent using staff, volunteers, friends, family members and close associates of contestants, candidates, parties and riding associations as a “proxy” for their secret influence activities.

In addition, Bill C-70 gives the federal Cabinet dangerously broad discretion to:

1. Exclude foreign interference arrangements from the list of prohibited activities that are also required to be disclosed;

2. Exclude public officials from the list of people foreign agents are required to disclose if they communicate with them;

3. Limit the amount of information required to be disclosed in the FIR and to not require regular updates, and;

4. Decide when the provisions that establish the FIT Commissioner and the FIR will come into force, and be extended to provincial, municipal and Indigenous politicians and public officials and, if amended, also territorial politicians and public officials (there are no deadlines in the Bill).

In terms of enforcement, if key changes are not made to Bill C-70, the proposed new Foreign Influence Transparency (FIT) Commissioner will lack independence, not be effective, and will be allowed to bury cases with secret decisions, and will not be accountable if they fail to enforce the rules (like the federal Ethics Commissioner and Commissioner of Lobbying for the past 20 years) because they will be:

1.Partisan and political because they will be handpicked behind closed doors by the ruling party Cabinet, with little input from opposition parties;

2.Not necessarily serving a full 7-year term because Cabinet can shorten it;

3.Encouraged to please the ruling party towards the end of their term because the ruling party Cabinet has the sole power to re-appoint them;

4.Ineffective because they will not be required to do regular, unannounced audits to catch violators;

5.Secretive because they will not be required to issue public rulings with reasons on every situation they review, and;

6.Unaccountable because it is unclear in Bill C-70 whether their decisions and actions can be challenged in court if they fail to do their job properly.

Also re: enforcement, given the RCMP and FINTRAC lack independence from the ruling party Cabinet, and the RCMP has been ineffective and secretive in the SNC-Lavalin and Aga Khan scandals, and in enforcing the federal lobbying law and anti-money laundering law, and FINTRAC has been ineffective as well:

7.Democracy Watch’s submission calls for a new, fully independent, effective, transparent and accountable anti-foreign interference, anti-corruption and anti-money laundering police force to be established.

“If loopholes in the bill are not closed, secret, unethical and undemocratic foreign interference in elections, party leadership races, parties and government policy-making processes will continue to be legal across Canada, and enforcement will be weak, ineffective, secretive and too much under the control of the ruling party Cabinet,” said Duff Conacher, Co-founder of Democracy Watch. “Many other changes are needed beyond a foreign agent registry to actually stop foreign interference.  Last year the lobbying commissioner gutted ethical lobbying rules, and MPs added a loophole to their ethics code so foreign-sponsored lobby groups can sponsor intern spies in their offices.  Those changes, combined with the existing loopholes in Canada’s election, political donation and spending, lobbying and ethics laws, make it even easier than it was in the past for foreign governments, businesses and organizations to influence Canadian politics and politicians in secret, including by making false claims on social media sites.”

“All our key democracy and anti-corruption laws, including laws aimed at stopping foreign interference, are enforced by weak lapdogs who are handpicked by the ruling party Cabinet, operate largely in secret and lack powers and accountability for doing their jobs properly,” said Conacher.  “If Bill C-70 is not changed in key ways, the new foreign interference commissioner will be another  partisan, ineffective, secretive and unaccountable lapdog.”

Click here to see the Backgrounder that summarizes all the loopholes and weak enforcement problems that make foreign interference legal and easy to do across Canada at every level of government.  Click here to see summary list of 17 key changes that need to be made to stop foreign interference.

– 30 –

Duff Conacher, Co-founder of Democracy Watch
Tel: (613) 241-5179
Cell: 416-546-3443
Email: [email protected]

Democracy Watch’s Stop Foreign Interference in Canadian Politics Campaign page and Stop Secret Unethical Lobbying Campaign page