Please support democracy

Without your support, Democracy Watch can't win key changes to stop governments and big businesses from abusing their power and hurting you and your family. Please click here to support democracy now

Democracy Watch launches national letter-writing and petition drive for laws to stop election fraud robocalls, and to strengthen enforcement of election laws

Friday, September 21, 2012

OTTAWA – Today, Democracy Watch launched a national letter-writing and petition drive on Change.org calling for politicians across Canada to pass effective laws to stop election fraud robocalls, and to strengthen enforcement of election laws.

“Canadians have heard lots of talk from politicians saying they are concerned about false election robocalls and enforcement of election laws, but it is clear politicians need to be pushed and so we are making it easy for people across the country to add their voice to the call for politicians across Canada to make the changes needed to clean up and ensure our elections are fair,” said Tyler Sommers, Coordinator for Democracy Watch.

False robocalls were received by tens of thousands of voters in more than 230 ridings during the spring 2011 federal election, and were also used to mislead voters in some recent provincial elections.

Last March, federal politicians unanimously supported Democracy Watch’s proposal to pass a law quickly to stop false election robocalls, and the NDP’s motion to do this set a deadline for this fall for the federal Conservative government to introduce the changes.

Measures to make false robocalls illegal and essentially impossible will help, but there are also enforcement problems.

Elections Canada has failed to disclose the rulings it has made on more than 3,000 complaints it has received since 1997, and has recently made some very questionable rulings.  Elections Canada must be required to disclose every ruling it makes to ensure that it proves it is enforcing the law fairly and properly (and election agencies across Canada must also be required to disclose all their rulings).

Democracy Watch is calling on Canadians to send a letter and to sign the petition that both call not only on federal politicians to introduce and pass a law to stop false election robocalls and strengthen enforcement, but also for politicians in every province and territory to pass similar laws that apply to their provincial, territorial and municipal elections.

— 30 —

FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT:

Tyler Sommers, Coordinator of Democracy Watch

Tel: 613-241-5179

Email: [email protected]

Internet: http://democracywatch.ca

Federal Conservative Cabinet Minister Tony Clement’s Lobbying Act proposed changes allow secret, unethical lobbying


Set out below is a letter-to-the-editor by Democracy Watch Coordinator Tyler Sommers which was published in Rabble.ca on September 19, 2012, the Edmonton Sun on September 24, 2012, and the Hill Times September 24, 2012


While the measures promised by federal Conservative Cabinet minister Tony Clement to change the federal Lobbying Act will increase disclosure of the activities of some lobbyists in some ways, secret, unethical lobbying of the federal government will continue to be legal unless other changes are made.

Minister Clement has only pledged to extend an existing measure to require disclosure of meetings by only registered lobbyists with lower-level government officials who have decision-making power (currently only meetings with senior officials are required to be disclosed).

To ensure all lobbying is disclosed, anyone who communicates about decisions with any politician, their staff and appointees, or any government official, must be required to register and disclose all their communications, whether or not they are paid or are lobbying full-time.

Until this change is made, Cabinet ministers and many other politicians and officials will continue to be able to leave government and the lobby the government the next day.  They can do this by exploiting loopholes in the Act by arranging to be paid for advice while doing their lobbying for free, or by lobbying part-time for a business, and by communicating informally or by email with policy-makers.

These are the loopholes that Bruce Carson and Rahim Jaffer exploited, and more than three dozen other lobbyists also exploited in the past seven years.  None of them were charged, let alone prosecuted and penalized, for failing to register as a lobbyist under the Lobbying Act.

So no one should be fooled by Minister Clement’s charade — his proposed changes will shine only a small light on some lobbying of the federal government, while leaving lots of high-powered lobbying in the shadows.


For more details, go to Democracy Watch’s Government Ethics Campaign

Federal Liberal leadership race rules undemocratic, unethical


Set out below is a letter-to-the-editor by Democracy Watch Coordinator Tyler Sommers which was published in the the Hill Times on September 17, 2012


The federal Liberals had an opportunity to set ethical, democratic rules for their party leadership race, but have failed to do so.

The $75,000 entry fee is much too high, and candidates should have been allowed to qualify through gathering signatures of support, not just by paying an exorbitant fee.

Candidates who are not MPs are not required by law to disclose all donations they receive because of loopholes — so the Party should be requiring this disclosure.

Candidates are also not required by law to disclose support they receive through volunteer labour because of loopholes — so the Party should also be requiring this disclosure so that anyone who does a favour for any candidate will be known and future conflicts of interest can be prevented.

Loans to candidates by themselves should have prohibited, and the amount of any loan should have been limited to the same level donations are limited ($1,300).

And people casting a ballot should have been allowed to vote “none-of-the-above” if they don’t like any of the candidates.

It is dangerous to allow political parties who are choosing a potential Prime Minister to set whatever rules they want for their leadership race — the above rules should be added to the Canada Elections Act, and Elections Canada given full powers to oversee leadership races.


For more details, go to Democracy Watch’s Voter Rights Campaign page

In celebration of International Democracy Day (Sept. 15th), Democracy Watch launches new, interactive website that invites all Canadians to “Become a Democracy Watcher”

NEWS RELEASE

In celebration of International Democracy Day (Sept. 15th), Democracy Watch launches new, interactive website that invites all Canadians to “Become a Democracy Watcher”

Friday, September 14, 2012

OTTAWA – Today, to celebrate International Democracy Day (Sept. 15), Democracy Watch launched its new website.  Same great key information, but much easier for Canadians to find what they want and to join in with the more than 18,000 people and 120 organizations across Canada that support Democracy Watch’s successful, leading campaigns to clean up Canadian governments and businesses, and to make Canada the world’s leading democracy.

Viewers of the site can now send letters to key politicians across Canada with one click calling for key changes to require everyone in politics in Canada to be honest, ethical, open, representative and waste-preventing, and to require Canada’s big businesses and big banks to serve everyone fairly and well at fair prices, and to act responsibly.

Viewers can also Become a Democracy Watcher and help win these key changes in other ways — organize an event (including a CoffeeParty.ca event), lobby a politician to sign the Good Government Pledge, do research, and of course donate to help Democracy Watch’s winning campaigns keep on winning.

Democracy Watch has won a lot of key changes for Canadians in the past 19 years – more than 110 changes to federal and provincial laws that have required Canadian politicians and governments and big businesses to be more honest, open, ethical, representative, waste-preventing and responsible, and accountable.  In fact, Democracy Watch has won more changes than any other Canadian citizen group since 1993.

Canadians know who is lobbying and donating to which politicians (and donations are limited and only individuals can donate) because of changes Democracy Watch and the coalitions it coordinates have won, and ethics rules for politicians, bureaucrats and lobbyists are stronger, and better enforced, than in the past because of Democracy Watch’s campaigns, and Canada’s banks are required to serve people better, and all big businesses required to act more responsibly, because of changes Democracy Watch’s campaigns have won.

But more changes are needed – the Lobbying Act, Canada Elections Act, Conflict of Interest Act and MP and senator ethics codes, Access to Information Act, Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act and federal corporate responsibility laws are all being reviewed over the next several months by federal politicians.  As it has for the past 19 years, Democracy Watch is leading the campaigns for key changes to strengthen all of these laws to make everyone in federal politics more democratic and accountable, and all big businesses more responsible and accountable.

Democracy Watch’s eight campaigns are aimed at making Canada the world’s leading democracy by stopping election fraud, government waste, patronage and cronyism in Cabinet appointments, gouging by big businesses, secret, unethical deals that help big businesses and hurt everyone else, secret lobbying, secret donations and excessive government secrecy, and creating effective systems to protect whistleblowers who report government and big business wrongdoing.

– 30 –

FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT:

Tyler Sommers, Coordinator of Democracy Watch

Tel: 613-241-5179

Email: [email protected]

Internet: http://democracywatch.ca

Federal Liberal leadership race rules undemocratic, unethical


Set out below is a letter-to-the-editor by Democracy Watch Coordinator Tyler Sommers which was published in the Huffington Post on September 9, 2012


The Liberal Party of Canada recently revealed the rules governing their next party leadership election.Despite having an opportunity to set ethical and democratic rules for this race to ensure that it is not tarnished, as past races have been, by unethical, secretive, unfair, and unrepresentative actions by candidates and officials, the party failed to go far enough in doing so.

To uphold the democratic principles of one person, one vote, and of honesty, openness, ethics and fair and accurate representation, the Liberal Party should have made decisions to eliminate or drastically limit the entry fee and require the disclosure of key information regarding the race.

Setting the entry fee at $75,000 poses an undue hurdle for many potential candidates and should have been replaced through allowing candidates to qualify by gathering signatures and support, not by buying their way into the race.

In law, because of loopholes, candidates for leadership are not required to disclose all of the donations they receive nor are they required to disclose the support they receive through volunteer labour.  The party could have remedied this and in doing so established a much more open, transparent, and democratic leadership election through requiring the disclosure of all donations and requiring disclosure so that anyone who does a favour for a candidate will be known and potential conflicts of interest could be avoided.

Learning from past leadership races and the incredible amount of debt that candidates have taken on loans to candidates by themselves should have been prohibited, and the amount of any loan should have been limited to the same level that donations are limited ($1,300).

To ensure that every voter can cast a ballot and exercise their democratic right of voting for whom they want everyone should be given the option of voting “none-of-the-above” if they don’t like any of the candidates.

These changes should be instituted by all parties and added to the Elections Act, as promised by the federal Conservatives in 2006, to ensure that political parties choosing a potential Prime Minister operate democratically.  Unfortunately the Liberal party has missed out on an opportunity to establish a strong and democratic precedent for future leadership elections not only within their party, but for all federal and provincial political parties.


For more details, go to Democracy Watch’s Voter Rights Campaign page

Ontarians should not be surprised at low voter turnout in provincial by-elections — Changes needed to election timing, voting system, and voter rights and advertising to increase voter turnout in by-elections and general elections

News Release

Ontarians should not be surprised at low voter turnout in provincial by-elections

Changes needed to election timing, voting system, and voter rights and advertising to increase voter turnout in by-elections and general elections

Friday, September 7, 2012

OTTAWA – Today Democracy Watch called for democratic changes to Ontario’s election system in response to low voter turnout in the recent provincial by-elections.  Changes to educating Ontarians about their democratic rights, election dates, and ensuring honesty in politics would have led to higher voter turnout.

“Given that only 48.2% of eligible voters cast their ballots in the last provincial election, the lowest percentage in Ontario history, and we’re looking at approximately 26% turnout for Vaughan and 47% turnout for Waterloo in these by-elections, major changes are clearly needed to counter this threat to the provincial government’s democratic legitimacy.” Said Tyler Sommers, Coordinator of Democracy Watch.  “Unfortunately Elections Ontario and the Government of Ontario have failed to change anything so far, and Premier McGuinty chose dates for the by-elections when many people were on holiday, helping their children get ready for school, or moving for college or university, all of which likely hurt voter turnout.”

In addition to Elections Ontario properly educating voters about their right to decline the ballot (and disclosing declined ballot totals in election results), and the government changing the fixed election date to late October-early November (as with municipal elections), the provincial Election Act must also be changed to prohibit holding by-elections during the summer months and holiday periods, and at times when post-secondary students are moving, to ensure many voters are not essentially prevented from voting.

In addition, the most important changes the Ontario parties can make to increase voter turnout are as follows:

  • pass an honesty-in-politics law that gives voters an easy, low-cost way to file complaints to the Integrity Commissioner, and gives the Commissioner the power to penalize misleaders (and requires MPPs who switch parties in-between elections to resign and run in a by-election);
  • change the voting system so that the percentage of MPPs each party receives more closely matches the popular vote percentages.

These changes would give voters a reason to vote because they would know that voting for a specific party would mean a guaranteed result in terms of percentage of MPPs elected and promises kept.

In addition, if the parties strengthen provincial ethics, political finance, lobbying, open government, and whistleblower protection laws, voters will have more reason to vote because they would be more assured of good government no matter which party won.

“In addition to election dates often making it difficult for people to pay full attention to campaigns and get to the polls on election day, Canadians know from experience that they are not going to get what they vote for, and are likely to get dishonest, secretive, unethical, unrepresentative and wasteful government no matter who they vote for, and as a result no one should be surprised to see voter turnout dropping lower and lower,” said Sommers.

These problems exist in all the provinces and territories across Canada.  All of these changes should be made by the federal and provincial and territorial governments, and for their municipalities, before either mandatory or Internet voting are tried (because both of those changes will likely have serious negative effects).

– 30 –
FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT:
Tyler Sommers, Coordinator of Democracy Watch
Tel: (613) 241-5179
[email protected]
Democracy Watch’s Voter’s Rights Campaign