Campagne « Protégez les lanceurs d’alerte qui vous protègent »

Plaider à mieux protéger les personnes qui vous protègent, vous et votre famille, en dénonçant les abus, le gaspillage et les infractions à la loi du gouvernement et des grandes entreprises

Veuillez envoyer votre lettre dès maintenant en utilisant le formulaire sur cette page et contribuez à faire passer le message en aimant et en tweetant cette page.

Liens clés

Veuillez télécharger et publier sur les médias sociaux ou imprimer et afficher partout la pancarte Je vote pour un bon gouvernement
Appelez les politiciens qui vous représentent à Prendre l’engagement démocratique pour un bon gouvernement

Campaign News

Le Parti Vert reçoit la note B – la meilleure des mauvaises notes dans le rapport sur les plates-formes de réforme démocratique des partis fédéraux à l’horizon 2025

avril 24, 2025 4:56

L’intérêt public, et non l’intérêt personnel partisan, est nécessaire pour apporter des changements afin de mettre fin à l’ingérence étrangère avant une élection.

mars 3, 2025 3:54

L’intérêt public, et non l’intérêt personnel partisan, doit être pris en compte avant la prorogation ou les prochaines élections fédérales.

janvier 6, 2025 1:35

Read all campaign news

L’opportunité

Les personnes qui travaillent au sein ou avec les gouvernements et les grandes entreprises savent ce qui se passe. Si elles sont pleinement protégées et peuvent dénoncer les abus, le gaspillage et les infractions à la loi, elles peuvent vous protéger, vous et votre famille, contre les abus et le gaspillage d’argent.

Le gouvernement canadien révise actuellement sa loi sur la protection des lanceurs d’alerte, très faible et imparfaite, et les politiciens doivent entendre le plus grand nombre possible d’électeurs réclamer des changements clés pour protéger pleinement les lanceurs d’alerte et protéger ainsi votre famille.

Partout au Canada, les gouvernements subissent une pression croissante pour protéger des lanceurs d’alerte qui dénoncent les abus, le gaspillage et les infractions à la loi du gouvernement et des grandes entreprises. Vous pouvez contribuer à une meilleure protection en cliquant sur « ENVOYER » pour envoyer la lettre à droite à vos élus provinciaux et fédéraux.

Contexte

Le gouvernement canadien a initialement mis en place un système très faible de protection des lanceurs d’alerte en 2000. Heureusement, le premier commissaire à la tête de ce système a admis après un an qu’il était trop faible pour protéger qui que ce soit.

Cela, combiné aux pressions de Démocratie en surveillance et d’autres organisations, a conduit à l’adoption d’une nouvelle loi, la Loi sur la protection des fonctionnaires divulgateurs d’actes répréhensibles (LPFDAR), en 2005, qui a été légèrement renforcée en 2007.

En 2011, le vérificateur général a constaté que la première commissaire fédérale à l’intégrité, Christiane Ouimet, avait un bilan négligent en matière d’application de la loi dans plus de 200 cas. Le gouvernement conservateur fédéral a versé 500 000 $ à Ouimet et lui a interdit de parler de ses actes après son congédiement.

La coalition de Démocratie en surveillance, composée de plus de 30 groupes, a continué de faire pression pour des changements jusqu’en 2011, mais le gouvernement conservateur n’a pris aucune mesure pour renforcer la protection des lanceurs d’alerte.

En 2014, le deuxième commissaire à l’intégrité, Mario Dion, a été jugé gravement négligent par la Cour fédérale du Canada. Les conservateurs fédéraux lui ont confié un autre poste : celui de président de la Commission de l’immigration et du statut de réfugié du Canada.

L’actuel commissaire fédéral à l’intégrité, Joe Friday, a travaillé avec les commissaires Ouimet et Dion.

En 2015 et href=”https://democracywatch.ca/report-card-on-the-federal-parties-2019-democratic-reform-platforms/” rel=”noopener”>2019 et 2021 élections fédérales, les libéraux de Trudeau n’ont inclus aucune promesse de renforcer la protection des lanceurs d’alerte dans leur plateforme électorale. Cependant, en juin 2017, un comité de la Chambre des communes a unanimement réclamé des changements clés pour renforcer la protection des lanceurs d’alerte fédéraux. En février 2021, le comité a de nouveau demandé au gouvernement Trudeau de répondre à son rapport. Après les élections de 2021, le premier ministre Trudeau a mandaté son ministre du Conseil du Trésor pour étudier des modifications visant à renforcer la loi fédérale sur la dénonciation.

Send your letter to key politicians calling for changes to protect people who protect you by whistleblowing

Enter your details:

Message Subject (Please change as you like)

Your Message (Please change as you like)

Hello,

I am writing today to call on all governments across Canada (federal, provincial, territorial, municipal) to strengthen whistleblower protection laws and enforcement systems in the following key ways to ensure everyone who blows the whistle on abuse, waste and law-breaking in government and business is protected and rewarded:

all whistleblowers must be effectively protected from retaliation, including politicians, political staff, government employees, suppliers and contractors, and members of the public, and in business all executives, employees, suppliers, contractors, customers and members of the public;
whistleblowers must be allowed, in all cases, to file their complaint directly with an integrity commissioner or similar enforcement agency;
everyone who witnesses or receives evidence of wrongdoing by anyone in politics, government or business must be required to report it to an integrity commissioner or similar enforcement agency (with the commissioner strictly and strongly required to keep their identity secret, and people allowed to submit evidence anonymously);
all whistleblowers must receive funding to pay for complete legal advice (or a specialized, fully independent, publicly funded legal clinic should be established to provide this advice for free to all whistleblowers);
any person nominated and chosen to be the integrity commissioner or similar whistleblower protection commissioner must be required to have legal experience and a strong record of enforcing whistleblower protection, ethics rules or similar accountability laws;
the process for choosing an integrity commissioner or similar commissioner must be overseen by an independent committee of individuals from outside government and politics whose members are chosen by all political parties represented in the legislature, and the committee must conduct a public, merit-based search for candidates, and submit a short list to Cabinet from which the commissioner must be chosen (matching the best-practice appointment process for Ontario’s provincial judges);
the integrity commissioner or similar commissioner must not be eligible for a renewal of their fixed term in office (to ensure that the commissioner does not act as a lapdog to try to get re-appointed by Cabinet for another term);
the integrity commissioner or similar commissioner must be clearly designated as the trainer (including by issuing interpretation bulletins), investigator and enforcer of all government policies (other than the policies enforced by the Auditor General) and must be required to conduct training sessions, conduct regular random audits of compliance and to investigate whistleblower complaints about violations of these policies, and the same powers must be given to an overall enforcement agency to protect business whistleblowers in every jurisdiction;
when the integrity commissioner refers a whistleblower complaint about the violation of another law, regulation or policy for which a designated investigative and enforcement agency exists, the commissioner must be required to ensure that the agency investigates the complaint within 90 days, and if an investigation does not begin within this time frame the commissioner must be required to investigate the complaint;
the law must require employers to prove that no retaliation against a whistleblower has taken place (as opposed to requiring the whistleblower to prove that retaliation has occurred);
the integrity commissioner or similar commissioner must be given the power to order chief executives/heads of government departments and businesses to take corrective action, and chief executives/heads must be required to report to the commissioner on corrective actions taken;
the integrity commissioner or similar commissioner must be given the power to penalize any chief executive/head with a fine, suspension or firing if the chief executive does not comply with the commissioner’s order, or if anyone retaliates against a whistleblower or does not maintain a system that complies with the law;
the minimum fine for retaliating against a whistleblower must be $50,000, with a maximum range of fines from $100,000 to $200,000 for government officials, and 40% of total annual salary for business executives, and loss of any severance payment, and partial clawback of any pension payments;
the identity of anyone in politics, government or business found guilty of wrongdoing must be made public in all cases;
government whistleblowers whose allegations are proven must receive an immediate payment of at least one year’s salary from the government general revenue fund (and for business whistleblowers a payment from the business) so that they can, if they want, seek another job if the whistleblowing process has left them completely alienated from all their co-workers (and they should also be given priority in switching jobs in the government or business);
whistleblowers must be allowed to appeal to court for a review of any ruling by the integrity commissioner or similar commissioner or whistleblower protection enforcement entity, and;
at least every 3 years (and immediately at the federal level), it must be required that an independent audit of the entire whistleblower protection system be conducted by the Auditor General or other independent body.

Please let me know what you will do to ensure that these changes are made as soon as possible. I will be deciding which political party to vote for in the next election based on the responses I receive from representatives in each party. I look forward to hearing from you.

Hello,
I am writing today to call on all governments across Canada (federal, provincial, territorial, municipal) to strengthen whistleblower protection laws and enforcement systems in the following key ways to ensure everyone who blows the whistle on abuse, waste and law-breaking in government and business is protected and rewarded:
<ol>
<li>all whistleblowers must be effectively protected from retaliation, including politicians, political staff, government employees, suppliers and contractors, and members of the public, and in business all executives, employees, suppliers, contractors, customers and members of the public;</li>
<li>whistleblowers must be allowed, in all cases, to file their complaint directly with an integrity commissioner or similar enforcement agency;</li>
<li>everyone who witnesses or receives evidence of wrongdoing by anyone in politics, government or business must be required to report it to an integrity commissioner or similar enforcement agency (with the commissioner strictly and strongly required to keep their identity secret, and people allowed to submit evidence anonymously);</li>
<li>all whistleblowers must receive funding to pay for complete legal advice (or a specialized, fully independent, publicly funded legal clinic should be established to provide this advice for free to all whistleblowers);</li>
<li>any person nominated and chosen to be the integrity commissioner or similar whistleblower protection commissioner must be required to have legal experience and a strong record of enforcing whistleblower protection, ethics rules or similar accountability laws;</li>
<li>the process for choosing an integrity commissioner or similar commissioner must be overseen by an independent committee of individuals from outside government and politics whose members are chosen by all political parties represented in the legislature, and the committee must conduct a public, merit-based search for candidates, and submit a short list to Cabinet from which the commissioner must be chosen (matching the best-practice appointment process for Ontario’s provincial judges);</li>
<li>the integrity commissioner or similar commissioner must not be eligible for a renewal of their fixed term in office (to ensure that the commissioner does not act as a lapdog to try to get re-appointed by Cabinet for another term);</li>
<li>the integrity commissioner or similar commissioner must be clearly designated as the trainer (including by issuing interpretation bulletins), investigator and enforcer of all government policies (other than the policies enforced by the Auditor General) and must be required to conduct training sessions, conduct regular random audits of compliance and to investigate whistleblower complaints about violations of these policies, and the same powers must be given to an overall enforcement agency to protect business whistleblowers in every jurisdiction;</li>
<li>when the integrity commissioner refers a whistleblower complaint about the violation of another law, regulation or policy for which a designated investigative and enforcement agency exists, the commissioner must be required to ensure that the agency investigates the complaint within 90 days, and if an investigation does not begin within this time frame the commissioner must be required to investigate the complaint;</li>
<li>the law must require employers to prove that no retaliation against a whistleblower has taken place (as opposed to requiring the whistleblower to prove that retaliation has occurred);</li>
<li>the integrity commissioner or similar commissioner must be given the power to order chief executives/heads of government departments and businesses to take corrective action, and chief executives/heads must be required to report to the commissioner on corrective actions taken;</li>
<li>the integrity commissioner or similar commissioner must be given the power to penalize any chief executive/head with a fine, suspension or firing if the chief executive does not comply with the commissioner’s order, or if anyone retaliates against a whistleblower or does not maintain a system that complies with the law;</li>
<li>the minimum fine for retaliating against a whistleblower must be $50,000, with a maximum range of fines from $100,000 to $200,000 for government officials, and 40% of total annual salary for business executives, and loss of any severance payment, and partial clawback of any pension payments;</li>
<li>the identity of anyone in politics, government or business found guilty of wrongdoing must be made public in all cases;</li>
<li>government whistleblowers whose allegations are proven must receive an immediate payment of at least one year’s salary from the government general revenue fund (and for business whistleblowers a payment from the business) so that they can, if they want, seek another job if the whistleblowing process has left them completely alienated from all their co-workers (and they should also be given priority in switching jobs in the government or business);</li>
<li>whistleblowers must be allowed to appeal to court for a review of any ruling by the integrity commissioner or similar commissioner or whistleblower protection enforcement entity, and;</li>
<li>at least every 3 years (and immediately at the federal level), it must be required that an independent audit of the entire whistleblower protection system be conducted by the Auditor General or other independent body.</li>
</ol>
Please let me know what you will do to ensure that these changes are made as soon as possible. I will be deciding which political party to vote for in the next election based on the responses I receive from representatives in each party. I look forward to hearing from you.

Thank you for sending your letter, and please help keep this campaign going until these key democracy reforms are won. To donate now, please click here.

privacy

To see where your letter goes, click here

Please support democracy

Plaider à mieux protéger les personnes qui vous protègent, vous et votre famille, en dénonçant les abus, le gaspillage et les infractions à la loi du gouvernement et des grandes entreprises

Liens clés

Campaign News

L’opportunité

Contexte