Mettre fin aux actions post-électorales injustes

Les élections fédérales sont serrées – vraiment serrées. Dangereusement serrées. Pourquoi ? Parce que le Canada n’a aucune règle concernant les conséquences d’un partage des voix et qu’aucun parti n’obtient la majorité des députés au Parlement.

L’absence de règles claires, équitables et publiques a provoqué une crise après les élections fédérales de 2008, lorsque le gouverneur général a autorisé le premier ministre Harper à fermer le Parlement pour éviter un vote contre son gouvernement et un éventuel changement de gouvernement.

Si un partage des voix se reproduit, le gouverneur général David Johnston, choisi par le premier ministre Harper et qui a protégé Harper et a protégé les conservateurs par le passé et choisira le parti qui formera le gouvernement.

Le gouverneur général Johnston, non élu et non responsable, décide également de la date de réouverture du Parlement, du soutien des députés au gouvernement et de la tenue ou non d’une nouvelle élection.

En Angleterre, en Australie et en Nouvelle-Zélande, les dirigeants des partis politiques et les députés ont convenu il y a des années de règles claires et publiques afin que le déroulement des élections soit équitable pour tous les partis et pour les électeurs. La plupart des pays du monde disposent également de règles post-électorales claires et publiques.

Veuillez envoyer votre lettre dès maintenant via le formulaire de cette page et diffuser l’information en partageant et en tweetant cette page.

Campaign News

Report Card on the Federal Parties’ 2019 Democratic Reform PlatformsReport Card on the Federal Parties’ 2019 Democratic Reform Platforms

octobre 18, 2019 10:27

(English) Group calls on Governor General and federal party leaders to publicly approve clear, fair post-election rules before election day

octobre 13, 2015 10:14

Read all campaign news

Contexte

La plupart des pays du monde disposent de règles écrites claires et applicables qui garantissent que leur président ou leur premier ministre ne peut abuser de ses pouvoirs, ignorer les résultats d’une élection et respecter la volonté du pouvoir législatif.

En Angleterre, en Australie et en Nouvelle-Zélande, les dirigeants des partis politiques et les députés ont convenu il y a des années de règles équitables afin que le déroulement des élections soit clair et équitable pour tous les partis et pour les électeurs (pour plus de détails sur ces trois pays, cliquez ici).

La première étape consiste pour tous les chefs de partis politiques à exprimer publiquement leur accord sur une liste de règles équitables. Ils peuvent le faire dès maintenant. L’étape suivante consiste pour les députés à adopter une résolution ou une loi définissant ces règles. Ces règles devraient couvrir les points clés suivants : ce qui se passe après une élection (surtout si aucun parti ne dispose de la majorité des députés) ; quand la législature doit être ouverte ; quand elle peut être fermée ; ce qu’est un vote de confiance/de défiance ; ce qui peut être inclus dans les projets de loi omnibus ; la liberté et les pouvoirs des politiciens de voter comme ils l’entendent sur les résolutions et les projets de loi ; comment les membres des commissions législatives sont choisis ; quand les élections ont lieu ; ce que peut faire un Cabinet pendant une campagne électorale jusqu’à la composition du Cabinet suivant.

Ce ne sera pas facile – rien de ce qui vaut la peine d’être fait ne l’est jamais – mais ensemble, nous pouvons obtenir des règles qui garantissent des actions postélectorales équitables de la part du gouverneur général et des chefs des partis politiques fédéraux.

Veuillez contribuer à la poursuite de cette campagne jusqu’à ce que nous ayons des règles pour mettre fin aux actions postélectorales injustes. Pour faire un don maintenant, veuillez cliquer ici.

Send your letter to the Governor General and federal party leaders calling for public rules to ensure fair post-election actions by them all

Enter your details:

Message Subject (Please change as you like)

Your Message (Please change as you like)

Dear Governor General and federal party leaders:

A possible result in the 2015 election is that no party will win a majority of seats. There were several crises caused by the lack of clear rules (known as the “unwritten constitutional conventions”) concerning the relationship between the Governor General and the Prime Minister and governing Cabinet, and Parliament, during the minority governments from 2004-2011.

Most specifically the lack of clear, public rules caused a constitutional crisis less than two months after the 2008 election when the Governor General allowed Prime Minister Harper to shut down Parliament to avoid a vote challenging the government.

Unfortunately, unlike Parliaments in England, Australia and New Zealand years ago, Canadian political parties have still not worked together and written down the unwritten constitutional conventions to guide the action of all party leaders and MP, and the Governor General.

Despite this, there is general agreement on a few key fairness rules, and if no party wins a majority of seats in the House of Commons on election day, ensuring these rules are upheld will be essential to prevent yet another constitutional crisis.

Therefore, I call on the Governor General and all federal party leaders to publicly state before election day that they agree the following rules are constitutional conventions that must be upheld (conventions that politicians in the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand have agreed to in writing and all uphold), and I call on the Governor General to uphold the following rules fairly and impartially after election day, especially if no party wins a majority of seats:

The Governor General will not make a decision concerning which party or parties will be given the opportunity to govern first (ie. to appoint a Cabinet and introduce a Speech from the Throne in Parliament) until communicating directly with all the party leaders;
The party that wins the most seats in the election will be given the first opportunity to govern unless the leaders of other parties representing a majority of members of the House of Commons indicate clearly to the Governor General that they will not support that party and that they have agreed to form a coalition government or have agreed on a common legislative agenda;
Within 30 days after the Governor General decides which party or parties will be given the first opportunity to govern, the Governor General and the governing party/parties will open Parliament with a Speech from the Throne;
That even if the leaders of parties that represent a majority of members of the House of Commons do not indicate lack of support for the party that wins the most seats before that party’s Speech from the Throne, if they subsequently indicate lack of support for the Speech, the Governor General will not allow the Prime Minister-designate to prorogue Parliament before the Speech from the Throne is voted on by members of the House of Commons;
That if a majority of members in the House of Commons vote against the Speech from the Throne, the Governor General will give the opposition parties (through either a formal coalition or legislative agreement) an opportunity to govern before calling an election;
That if opposition parties introduce a motion of non-confidence in the governing party at any time after election day, the Governor General will not allow the Prime Minister to prorogue Parliament before the motion is voted on by the House of Commons, and;
That if a majority in the House of Commons vote to approve a motion of non-confidence in the governing party during the six-month period after that party introduces its Speech from the Throne, or vote against the governing party’s 2016-2017 budget, the Governor General will give the opposition parties (through either a formal coalition or legislative agenda agreement) an opportunity to govern before calling an election.

I urge all of you to make clear public statements approving these rules before the October 19th election day – please follow the example of politicians in the UK, Australia and New Zealand and prevent further crises that harm our democracy.

I will be deciding which political party to vote for in this election based on the responses I receive from each political party. I look forward to hearing from you very soon.

Dear Governor General and federal party leaders:
A possible result in the 2015 election is that no party will win a majority of seats. There were several crises caused by the lack of clear rules (known as the “unwritten constitutional conventions”) concerning the relationship between the Governor General and the Prime Minister and governing Cabinet, and Parliament, during the minority governments from 2004-2011.
Most specifically the lack of clear, public rules caused a constitutional crisis less than two months after the 2008 election when the Governor General allowed Prime Minister Harper to shut down Parliament to avoid a vote challenging the government.
Unfortunately, unlike Parliaments in England, Australia and New Zealand years ago, Canadian political parties have still not worked together and written down the unwritten constitutional conventions to guide the action of all party leaders and MP, and the Governor General.
Despite this, there is general agreement on a few key fairness rules, and if no party wins a majority of seats in the House of Commons on election day, ensuring these rules are upheld will be essential to prevent yet another constitutional crisis.
Therefore, I call on the Governor General and all federal party leaders to publicly state before election day that they agree the following rules are constitutional conventions that must be upheld (conventions that politicians in the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand have agreed to in writing and all uphold), and I call on the Governor General to uphold the following rules fairly and impartially after election day, especially if no party wins a majority of seats:
<ol>
<li>The Governor General will not make a decision concerning which party or parties will be given the opportunity to govern first (ie. to appoint a Cabinet and introduce a Speech from the Throne in Parliament) until communicating directly with all the party leaders;</li>
<li>The party that wins the most seats in the election will be given the first opportunity to govern unless the leaders of other parties representing a majority of members of the House of Commons indicate clearly to the Governor General that they will not support that party and that they have agreed to form a coalition government or have agreed on a common legislative agenda;</li>
<li>Within 30 days after the Governor General decides which party or parties will be given the first opportunity to govern, the Governor General and the governing party/parties will open Parliament with a Speech from the Throne;</li>
<li>That even if the leaders of parties that represent a majority of members of the House of Commons do not indicate lack of support for the party that wins the most seats before that party’s Speech from the Throne, if they subsequently indicate lack of support for the Speech, the Governor General will not allow the Prime Minister-designate to prorogue Parliament before the Speech from the Throne is voted on by members of the House of Commons;</li>
<li>That if a majority of members in the House of Commons vote against the Speech from the Throne, the Governor General will give the opposition parties (through either a formal coalition or legislative agreement) an opportunity to govern before calling an election;</li>
<li>That if opposition parties introduce a motion of non-confidence in the governing party at any time after election day, the Governor General will not allow the Prime Minister to prorogue Parliament before the motion is voted on by the House of Commons, and;</li>
<li>That if a majority in the House of Commons vote to approve a motion of non-confidence in the governing party during the six-month period after that party introduces its Speech from the Throne, or vote against the governing party’s 2016-2017 budget, the Governor General will give the opposition parties (through either a formal coalition or legislative agenda agreement) an opportunity to govern before calling an election.</li>
</ol>
I urge all of you to make clear public statements approving these rules before the October 19th election day – please follow the example of politicians in the UK, Australia and New Zealand and prevent further crises that harm our democracy.
I will be deciding which political party to vote for in this election based on the responses I receive from each political party. I look forward to hearing from you very soon.

Thank you for sending your letter, and please help keep this campaign going until these key democracy reforms are won. To donate now, please click here.

privacy

To see where your letter goes, click here

Please support democracy

Campaign News

Contexte