{"id":13598,"date":"2021-10-19T07:46:59","date_gmt":"2021-10-19T11:46:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/?p=13598"},"modified":"2025-05-25T07:15:08","modified_gmt":"2025-05-25T11:15:08","slug":"democracy-watch-case-going-ahead-vs-lobbying-commissioner-rulings-letting-off-lobbyists-who-helped-chrystia-freeland-win-election-then-lobbied-her-officials-and-staff","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/fr\/democracy-watch-case-going-ahead-vs-lobbying-commissioner-rulings-letting-off-lobbyists-who-helped-chrystia-freeland-win-election-then-lobbied-her-officials-and-staff\/","title":{"rendered":"Democracy Watch case going ahead vs. Lobbying Commissioner rulings letting off lobbyists who helped Chrystia Freeland win election, then lobbied her officials and staffDemocracy Watch case going ahead vs. Lobbying Commissioner rulings letting off lobbyists who helped Chrystia Freeland win election, then lobbied her officials and staff"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4 align=\"center\"><span style=\"color: black;\">Lobbying Commissioner trying to hide details of her investigation and ruling \u2013 judge will decide what Commissioner has to disclose<\/span><\/h4>\n\n<p><b>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:<\/b><br>Tuesday, October 19, 2021<\/p>\n\n<p>OTTAWA \u2013 Today, Democracy Watch announced that the Federal Court <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca\/fc-cf\/decisions\/en\/item\/498964\/index.do\" rel=\"noopener\">rejected the Trudeau government\u2019s motion<\/a> requesting that the court stop the cases Democracy Watch filed in August 2020 challenging the federal Commissioner of Lobbying\u2019s rulings about lobbyists <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/NoticeOfApplicLobbyComm_Bergen_Aug072020.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\">Ben Bergen<\/a> and <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/NoticeOfApplicLobbyComm_OBorn_Aug072020.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\">Dana O\u2019Born<\/a> of the Council of Canadian Innovators (CCI).<\/p>\n\n<p>The cases are continuing, and the next step is that the Commissioner is trying to stop the court and Democracy Watch from seeing the details of her investigation and findings that led to her ruling.  Under the <em>Lobbying Act<\/em>, investigations are conducted in private, but under Federal Court rules the Commissioner is required to disclose the record of her investigation so that the court can fully review whether it was conducted properly, and whether the rulings were also proper.<\/p>\n\n<p>The Commissioner and Democracy Watch will file their submissions on the investigation disclosure issue over the next month, and then the court will issue its ruling sometime after that.  Democracy Watch is represented by Andrew <span>Montague-Reinholdt and Rhian Foley of Nelligan O\u2019Brien Payne LLP.  The cases are Federal Court file nos. T-915-20 and T-916-20.<\/span><\/p>\n\n<p>Lobbying Commissioner Nancy B\u00e9langer ruled in March 2020, a <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/two-and-a-half-years-later-where-is-lobbying-commissioners-ruling-on-council-of-canadian-innovators-lobbying-of-liberal-cabinet\/\" rel=\"noopener\">completely unjustifiable delay of almost three years<\/a> after Democracy Watch filed its <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/LettToFedLobbyCommReCCIJul122017.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\">complaint<\/a>, that <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/lobbycanada.gc.ca\/en\/investigations\/reports-on-investigation\/benjamin-bergen-council-of-canadian-innovators\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Mr. Bergen<\/a> and <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/lobbycanada.gc.ca\/en\/investigations\/reports-on-investigation\/dana-o-born-council-of-canadian-innovators\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Ms. O\u2019Born<\/a> did not violate <em>Lobbyists\u2019 Code of Conduct<\/em> <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/lobbycanada.gc.ca\/en\/rules\/the-lobbyists-code-of-conduct\/lobbyists-code-of-conduct\" rel=\"noopener\">rules 6, 8, 9 or 10<\/a> which prohibit assisting a politician in any significant way and then lobbying their office or officials afterwards, even though they:<\/p>\n\n<ol><li>co-managed Chrystia Freeland\u2019s 2015 election campaign;<\/li>\n<li>continued to work in senior roles with her riding association post-election, and;<\/li>\n<li>then were hired for the top positions at CCI and lobbied in 2017 Freeland\u2019s then-Parliamentary Secretary David Lametti, her office staff, and senior officials in her then-International Trade department, including deputy ministers, assistant deputy ministers and special assistants.<\/li><\/ol>\n\n<p>Democracy Watch\u2019s case argues that Bergen and O\u2019Born\u2019s lobbying violated <em>Lobbyists\u2019 Code<\/em> rules.<\/p>\n\n<p><em>\u201cThe federal lobbying ethics code prohibits anyone from lobbying a Cabinet minister or their officials for four years after helping them get elected or assisting them in a significant way, and so Lobbying Commissioner B\u00e9langer should have found Minister Freeland\u2019s former election campaign managers guilty of violating the code given they lobbied many senior officials in Minister Freeland\u2019s former department before four years had passed,\u201d<\/em> said Duff Conacher, Co-founder of Democracy Watch.<\/p>\n\n<p><em>\u201cBy letting the CCI lobbyists off the hook, and issuing other similarly weak rulings in recent years letting off other unethical lobbyists, Lobbying Commissioner Nancy B\u00e9langer is continuing the negligent enforcement record of her predecessor <\/em><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/group-calls-on-auditor-general-to-audit-performance-of-federal-commissioner-of-lobbying-and-rcmp\/\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Karen Shepherd who let off 84% of the lobbyists who violated the law<\/em><\/a><em> during her decade as commissioner,\u201d<\/em> said Conacher.<\/p>\n\n<p>The case was delayed in fall 2020 waiting for the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) to  decide whether to allow DWatch to appeal the Federal Court of Appeal\u2019s <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ctvnews.ca\/politics\/appeal-court-nixes-fresh-lobby-probe-of-aga-khan-in-trudeau-vacation-case-1.4879782\" rel=\"noopener\">ruling<\/a> on its case challenging former Lobbying Commissioner Karen Shepherd\u2019s <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/trudeau-liberals-appeal-of-federal-court-ruling-ordering-lobbying-commissioner-to-investigate-aga-khans-bahamas-trip-gift-to-pm-trudeau-in-court-today\/\" rel=\"noopener\">decision<\/a> not to investigate the Aga Khan for giving Justin Trudeau\u2019s family and friends a trip to his private Bahamas island.  Incredibly, the FCA <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.cba.org\/Sections\/Administrative-Law\/Articles\/2020\/that-lobbying-commissioner-has-no-duty\" rel=\"noopener\">ruled<\/a> that the public had no right to have a complaint ruled on by the Commissioner, and therefore no right to challenge a decision not to investigate a complaint.<\/p>\n\n<p>The SCC <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/supreme-court-of-canada-strikes-a-blow-against-publics-right-to-complain-about-government-and-lobbyist-wrongdoing-by-refusing-to-allow-dwatch-to-appeal-federal-court-of-appeal-ruling-in-aga-k\/\" rel=\"noopener\">decided not to hear DWatch\u2019s appeal<\/a>.  However, the Bergen and O\u2019Born cases are different because the Commissioner issued final rulings under section 10.5 of the <em>Lobbying Act<\/em> after investigating.  In contrast, in the Aga Khan case, the Commissioner <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/laws-lois.justice.gc.ca\/eng\/acts\/l-12.4\/page-5.html#h-339367\" rel=\"noopener\">refused to investigate under subsection 10.4(1) of the <em>Act<\/em><\/a>.<\/p>\n\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">&#8211; 30 &#8211;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT:<\/strong><br>Duff Conacher, Co-founder of Democracy Watch<br>Tel: (613) 241-5179<br>Cell: 416-546-3443<br>Email: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"mailto:info@democracywatch.ca\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">info@democracywatch.ca<\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">Democracy Watch\u2019s <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/campaigns\/government-ethics-campaign\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Government Ethics Campaign<\/a><\/p>\n\n<h4 align=\"center\"><span style=\"color: black;\">Lobbying Commissioner trying to hide details of her investigation and ruling \u2013 judge will decide what Commissioner has to disclose<\/span><\/h4>\n\n<p><b>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:<\/b><br>Tuesday, October 19, 2021<\/p>\n\n<p>OTTAWA \u2013 Today, Democracy Watch announced that the Federal Court <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca\/fc-cf\/decisions\/en\/item\/498964\/index.do\" rel=\"noopener\">rejected the Trudeau government\u2019s motion<\/a> requesting that the court stop the cases Democracy Watch filed in August 2020 challenging the federal Commissioner of Lobbying\u2019s rulings about lobbyists <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/NoticeOfApplicLobbyComm_Bergen_Aug072020.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\">Ben Bergen<\/a> and <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/NoticeOfApplicLobbyComm_OBorn_Aug072020.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\">Dana O\u2019Born<\/a> of the Council of Canadian Innovators (CCI).<\/p>\n\n<p>The cases are continuing, and the next step is that the Commissioner is trying to stop the court and Democracy Watch from seeing the details of her investigation and findings that led to her ruling.  Under the <em>Lobbying Act<\/em>, investigations are conducted in private, but under Federal Court rules the Commissioner is required to disclose the record of her investigation so that the court can fully review whether it was conducted properly, and whether the rulings were also proper.<\/p>\n\n<p>The Commissioner and Democracy Watch will file their submissions on the investigation disclosure issue over the next month, and then the court will issue its ruling sometime after that.  Democracy Watch is represented by Andrew <span>Montague-Reinholdt and Rhian Foley of Nelligan O\u2019Brien Payne LLP.  The cases are Federal Court file nos. T-915-20 and T-916-20.<\/span><\/p>\n\n<p>Lobbying Commissioner Nancy B\u00e9langer ruled in March 2020, a <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/two-and-a-half-years-later-where-is-lobbying-commissioners-ruling-on-council-of-canadian-innovators-lobbying-of-liberal-cabinet\/\" rel=\"noopener\">completely unjustifiable delay of almost three years<\/a> after Democracy Watch filed its <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/LettToFedLobbyCommReCCIJul122017.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\">complaint<\/a>, that <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/lobbycanada.gc.ca\/en\/investigations\/reports-on-investigation\/benjamin-bergen-council-of-canadian-innovators\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Mr. Bergen<\/a> and <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/lobbycanada.gc.ca\/en\/investigations\/reports-on-investigation\/dana-o-born-council-of-canadian-innovators\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Ms. O\u2019Born<\/a> did not violate <em>Lobbyists\u2019 Code of Conduct<\/em> <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/lobbycanada.gc.ca\/en\/rules\/the-lobbyists-code-of-conduct\/lobbyists-code-of-conduct\" rel=\"noopener\">rules 6, 8, 9 or 10<\/a> which prohibit assisting a politician in any significant way and then lobbying their office or officials afterwards, even though they:<\/p>\n\n<ol><li>co-managed Chrystia Freeland\u2019s 2015 election campaign;<\/li>\n<li>continued to work in senior roles with her riding association post-election, and;<\/li>\n<li>then were hired for the top positions at CCI and lobbied in 2017 Freeland\u2019s then-Parliamentary Secretary David Lametti, her office staff, and senior officials in her then-International Trade department, including deputy ministers, assistant deputy ministers and special assistants.<\/li><\/ol>\n\n<p>Democracy Watch\u2019s case argues that Bergen and O\u2019Born\u2019s lobbying violated <em>Lobbyists\u2019 Code<\/em> rules.<\/p>\n\n<p><em>\u201cThe federal lobbying ethics code prohibits anyone from lobbying a Cabinet minister or their officials for four years after helping them get elected or assisting them in a significant way, and so Lobbying Commissioner B\u00e9langer should have found Minister Freeland\u2019s former election campaign managers guilty of violating the code given they lobbied many senior officials in Minister Freeland\u2019s former department before four years had passed,\u201d<\/em> said Duff Conacher, Co-founder of Democracy Watch.<\/p>\n\n<p><em>\u201cBy letting the CCI lobbyists off the hook, and issuing other similarly weak rulings in recent years letting off other unethical lobbyists, Lobbying Commissioner Nancy B\u00e9langer is continuing the negligent enforcement record of her predecessor <\/em><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/group-calls-on-auditor-general-to-audit-performance-of-federal-commissioner-of-lobbying-and-rcmp\/\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Karen Shepherd who let off 84% of the lobbyists who violated the law<\/em><\/a><em> during her decade as commissioner,\u201d<\/em> said Conacher.<\/p>\n\n<p>The case was delayed in fall 2020 waiting for the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) to  decide whether to allow DWatch to appeal the Federal Court of Appeal\u2019s <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ctvnews.ca\/politics\/appeal-court-nixes-fresh-lobby-probe-of-aga-khan-in-trudeau-vacation-case-1.4879782\" rel=\"noopener\">ruling<\/a> on its case challenging former Lobbying Commissioner Karen Shepherd\u2019s <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/trudeau-liberals-appeal-of-federal-court-ruling-ordering-lobbying-commissioner-to-investigate-aga-khans-bahamas-trip-gift-to-pm-trudeau-in-court-today\/\" rel=\"noopener\">decision<\/a> not to investigate the Aga Khan for giving Justin Trudeau\u2019s family and friends a trip to his private Bahamas island.  Incredibly, the FCA <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.cba.org\/Sections\/Administrative-Law\/Articles\/2020\/that-lobbying-commissioner-has-no-duty\" rel=\"noopener\">ruled<\/a> that the public had no right to have a complaint ruled on by the Commissioner, and therefore no right to challenge a decision not to investigate a complaint.<\/p>\n\n<p>The SCC <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/supreme-court-of-canada-strikes-a-blow-against-publics-right-to-complain-about-government-and-lobbyist-wrongdoing-by-refusing-to-allow-dwatch-to-appeal-federal-court-of-appeal-ruling-in-aga-k\/\" rel=\"noopener\">decided not to hear DWatch\u2019s appeal<\/a>.  However, the Bergen and O\u2019Born cases are different because the Commissioner issued final rulings under section 10.5 of the <em>Lobbying Act<\/em> after investigating.  In contrast, in the Aga Khan case, the Commissioner <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/laws-lois.justice.gc.ca\/eng\/acts\/l-12.4\/page-5.html#h-339367\" rel=\"noopener\">refused to investigate under subsection 10.4(1) of the <em>Act<\/em><\/a>.<\/p>\n\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">&#8211; 30 &#8211;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT:<\/strong><br>Duff Conacher, Co-founder of Democracy Watch<br>Tel: (613) 241-5179<br>Cell: 416-546-3443<br>Email: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"mailto:info@democracywatch.ca\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">info@democracywatch.ca<\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">Democracy Watch\u2019s <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/campaigns\/government-ethics-campaign\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Government Ethics Campaign<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Lobbying Commissioner trying to hide details of her investigation and ruling \u2013 judge will decide what Commissioner has to disclose FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:Tuesday, October 19, 2021 OTTAWA \u2013 Today, Democracy Watch announced that the Federal Court rejected the Trudeau government\u2019s motion requesting that the court stop the cases Democracy Watch filed in August 2020 challenging [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13598","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13598","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13598"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13598\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18400,"href":"https:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13598\/revisions\/18400"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13598"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13598"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/democracywatch.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13598"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}