Democracy Watch is taking federal Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson and Lobbying Commissioner Karen Shepherd to court – challenging their dangerously weak and unlawful enforcement records.
Please help by making your donation now to the Ethics Lapdogs Court Case Fund, and by Sharing and Tweeting this page.
Since they were appointed in 2007, both the Ethics Commissioner and the Lobbying Commissioner have let more than 80% of people who have violated the rules off the hook. Their dangerously weak enforcement has let hundreds of federal politicians, government officials, and lobbyists get away with violating federal laws.
The federal Liberals decided last June to keep the Ethics Commissioner and Lobbying Commissioner in their positions until December, then they reappointed them for another 6 months, and they have just reappointed them again. The law says that they are only allowed to serve one 6-month term, and it’s a conflict of interest for the Liberal Cabinet to reappoint them because both commissioners are investigating Prime Minister Trudeau.
Democracy Watch has 3 court cases underway:
- challenging the Ethics Commissioner’s illegal “smokescreens" that allow Cabinet ministers and government officials to hide conflicts of interest, and;
- challenging the reappointment of the Ethics Commissioner, and;
- challenging the reappointment of the Lobbying Commissioner
And Democracy Watch is preparing another court case against the Ethics Commissioner challenging her rulings in Finance Minister Bill Morneau's ethics scandal.
We need your help to pay the costs for all of these lawsuits – please donate now and Share and Tweet this page to spread the word to anyone you think may be interested in supporting these lawsuits.
Thank you for your support,
Duff, Josephine, Brad
and the entire Democracy Watch team
Latest News About the Cases
News Release -- Democracy Watch launches court case challenging Ethics Commissioner’s unethical conflict of interest scheme for Federal Minister Dominic LeBlanc that allows him to hide whether and when he is making decisions that affect J.D. Irving’s interests